Posts Tagged ‘Sustainability’

Outsiders welcome!

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

I spent a few weeks in Seattle, and it only made me miss Cleveland more.  Being a transplant from the Pacific Northwest, it was quite a culture shock moving to Cleveland, Ohio.  America’s heartland, land of manufacturing, steel country.  But after living here for a decade, it is clear that things in the region have changed.  Out of necessity and a change in the general economy, Cleveland has burst forth with new ideas and is poised to be the cutting edge of sustainability with a new “green” economy.

Sure, there are a lot of things going on in the Seattle/Bellevue metropolitan region that make Cleveland pale by comparison.  Jobs comes to mind.  I heard on the local news that Bellevue, Washington has an unemployment rate of just over 5%.  That is lower than the Puget Sound region in general by nearly a percentage point and almost half of the national average.  But before you pack up the station wagon to head west, keep this in mind.  The AVERAGE house price in Bellevue is nearly $500,000.  The city is not populated with mansions, it is just a very expensive market.  Also, keep in mind that much of the economy in and around Seattle is built on technology-Microsoft and the like.

What is Cleveland doing?  We have lost much of our manufacturing base and the jobs that go with them.  As we strive to reinvent ourselves, we are tapping into our roots to find new products to make use of our real estate and form alliances to bring new manufacturing and new technologies to the region.  Let’s face it, California cannot keep up with the manufacture of solar panels, so Toledo is filling in the gaps.  If we can do the same with things like wind turbine parts and smart grid pieces, then the future of Cleveland’s new economy is bright.  Furthermore, as technology shrinks the world, major players in corporate America begin  to see Cleveland as an attractive place to build a new hub.  Centrally located to much of the country’s population, and with a low cost of living, it is an ideal place to set up shop.  Where else could you put a brand new headquarters right on lake front property, within an 8 hour drive of 75% of America’s populace and do it for about what a nice house would cost in a Seattle neighborhood.  And a CEO pulling down a million dollars a year can live like a Saudi prince in NE Ohio.

Seattle also beats out our region in traffic.  Commutes can be two hours each way and people do it every day.  Spending an hour in your car to get anywhere is not surprising.  This has, however, led to the development of dense urban neighborhoods.  If you want to be i the city, then they need to build a lot of stuff in a small area to make room for all those urbanites.  Every little neighborhood sports shopping, groceries, restaurants, and services.  Conversely, suburbs also have to provide more amenities, as the ability to “run into town” is nearly impossible.  This is where Cleveland can learn a thing or two.  Urban flight and suburban growth has led to sprawl and the loss of a vibrant downtown.  Gone forever is the Cleveland “garment district” and the downtown shopping at such renowned locations as Halle’s, the May Company and Higbee’s.   Replacing it are upscale suburban malls like Beachwood Place.  Tower City has given way to lifestyle centers like Legacy Village and Crocker Park.  Ease of access to the city center has made suburban living and downtown employment attractive and led to great buildings being replaced by surface parking lots.  In Seattle, as traffic worsens, public transportation has finally begun to take on a more meaningful role in the region.  Cleveland, however, continues to provide public transportation that is geared toward serving those who cannot private transportation.  Further, it cuts services and routes to the areas that could most benefit from expansion.

In the ares of waste and recycling, Cleveland is on par with much of the services of the Puget Sound area.  Just like Ohio, Washington has no bottle deposit, so cans and bottles are routinely tossed into garbage out of convenience.  From my observations, curbside recycling is not uniform within all the various city designations around the Seattle area and public awareness does not seem to be a priority around the region.  While this is similar to the current state of things around NE Ohio, things in Cleveland are improving.  While I saw a few recycling receptacles on Seattle city sidewalks, next to the garbage cans, and some areas had broad based curbside programs, Cleveland has a long term goal of full city curbside recycling over the next few years.  I spotted one compost bin on the sidewalk, whether that was a regular part of life, I do not know.  Cleveland has a pretty active grassroots movement for composting and recycling and major players like the Q and Tower City are implementing big composting plans within their facilities.  With the big companies on board, Cleveland could easily outpace Seattle’s current capacity in a very short time.PhotobucketAnd don’t forget that Cleveland is soon going to be turning its waste into energy, with its new electric facility that is scheduled for the near future.

The area where Cleveland and NE Ohio seems to be truly ahead is in local foods.  I love to eat and I love food.  While Seattle has the Pike Place Market and an abundance of fresh seafood, in an area with a huge population this is not enough.  I was shocked to see local grocery chains sporting Gulf seafood, Atlantic fish, Australian beef and even South American apples.  While this is not surprising in zones with short growing seasons and no access to the ocean, in a moderate climate with plenty of local farmland, it was shameful.  Furthermore, that watermelon that was shipped from California or Mexico was selling for anywhere from $7-$10.  And it was not that tasty.  Perhaps my experience in trying to always buy local and seasonal when I can has led me to be a bit of a food snob, but I would rather buy a ripe red tomato from a local farmer that 3 tomatoes from a chain that shipped them green from Texas and had almost no flavor.  I mentioned Fresh Fork to friends and family and the concept of a CSA seems completely foreign to all of them, while we have a long list of them here.  I only saw a couple of ads for local farmers markets, while we have dozens around the metro area.  Add to that the growing list of leaders in NE Ohio who are trying to tap into our farmers and their produce as an economic resource and you have something to be proud of.

So, Clevelanders can be proud to be here.  We have a vibrant music, arts and cultural scene and are leading much of the country when it comes to sustainability and creating a new economy.  When someone tells you they just moved here, don’t ask them, “Why CLeveland?”  Instead simply say, “Welcome.  You are gonna love it here!”

Bamboo bikes?

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

Bamboo is an amazing product.  It is rapidly renewable, cheap by comparison, and is easy to get rid of at the end of its life in whatever it is.  It has long been used for housing, furniture, and now even clothing.  So I was not the least bit surprised when I read about Organic Bikes.  They are bikes that have replaced much of the metal and plastic with bamboo.  I have not seen one up close, but they look awesome!

Organic Bikes is owned and operated by Wheel and Sprocket- a family owned bicycle shop since 1973. We began Organicbikes.com to re-think the way that bicycles and cycling products are manufactured, used, and recycled. While we do not claim to be fully “green”, or sustainable across the board- we think we have some great ideas and we are very excited to present them here! We hope that people will not only choose a bicycle over their car for transportation, but that they will consider Organic Bikes as a more sustainable choice in Bicycles!

I especially like that they do not make exaggerated claims or try to say they are the best green idea.  Nothing is that cut and dry!  They have a great idea, and they are doing their best to promote it as one piece of the sustainability puzzle.  Also from their website:

For the “Dylan” Bamboo Bicycle, we have removed the need for a lot of the original alloy tubing and replaced it with the fastest growing, strongest, and most renewable resource on the planet- bamboo. Not only is the bamboo natural, but it also provides a ride quality that is far more comfortable than standard alloy frames. What alloy is used for our Bamboo bikes is 100% recycled!

Our 100% bamboo fenders eliminate the need for plastic fenders, and our bamboo handlebars offer a comfy alternative to steel or aluminum.

Futhermore, when you are done with the Organic Bikes water bottle- throw it in your compost- as it is 100% Bio-Degradable! More products include messenger bags made from recycled or re-claimed materials, bamboo and organic clothing, and much more to come!

For you bike enthusiasts check them out for your next purchase!  Let’s face it, as the cost of oil continues to rise and the disaster in the gulf shows, we need to get off our butts more often ads spend more time using smart transportation and less driving.  That means more os us are going to need to make use of bicycles for parts of our transportation needs.  Why not buy a bike that uses less resources and is easier to dispose of when its life is over?  And if their website is any indication, a more comfortable ride comes with it.

LED or follow?

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010

So much has been said about the Supu-Opto deal that is on the table in Cleveland. I wrote about this deal a few weeks ago, and immediately started to get some feedback online.  Now, Brewed Fresh Daily has had several interesting blog posts, one by Councilman Brian Cummings himself, who staunchly opposes this plan.  I was all for it, then after reading Councilman Cummings post, I started thinking a little more.  Then, I was asked if I would like to attend a briefing at Mayor Jackson’s office in City Hall.  I was so there!  The other folks in the room ranged the gamut.  The city departments were there, Sustainability, Economic Development, etc, as well as the reps from the utilities.  No discussion on sustainability would be complete without local architect Bill Doty of Doty & Miller, and Paul Volpe of City Architecture.  The rest of the room was populated by persons of various stature that i do not know personally, but many are respected leaders in their area (it seemed inappropriate of me to ask them to tell me their names again so I could blog about them).  There were regular everyday citizens in the room as well.

I attended to find out a little more and to raise some of the concerns that I had over certain aspects of the deal that have come to my attention.  First off, let me tell you that I am not one to just “drink the Kool-Aid” and agree with anything in front of me.  On first glance, the deal with Sunpu-Opto is innovative and bold.  On looking a little deeper, it seems there is more lurking below the surface and that many are opposed to the deal that the Plain Dealer has been reporting on regularly.  I left the meeting feeling like I was certain that this was a step worth trying and that there was indeed a chance for it to make a difference to the local economy.  So here are just my thoughts, coupled with the things I learned online and at the meeting.

The terms of the deal mean that Cleveland will be locked into a 10 year deal with a semiconductor and LED manufacturer that will establish its North American headquarters in Cleveland and will provide a minimum of 350 new jobs to the area within 5 years.  So where to begin?

Jobs: Proponents of the deal say that 350 new jobs will be created in the manufacturing sector within 5 years, starting with 50 in the first year and building over the next five years.  A headquarters will be established here for sales, followed by a manufacturing facility, and finally a research and development facility.  The biggest concerns in the room were the quality of the jobs, the free ability of the employees to unionize, and living wages.  Opponents to the deal say that the jobs will be low paying jobs, “phantom” jobs, or simply will not materialize at all.  The proponents at the briefing assured us that there were strict timelines written into the deal that must be met, or we were free of the contract.  I am sure that this is overly simplified, but my thoughts on this are simple.  When a workforce is out of work, any possibility of new jobs must be looked at.  Even if opposition is right and the jobs turn out to be low paying jobs, a city that is embracing gambling as a way to bring ANY jobs to the local economy needs to give them a shot.  Saying no to this deal means saying no to those who would be willing to take any job, even at minimum wage, to save their home and feed their family as the unemployment benefits run out.  In a time when even fast food is not hiring, any job is a good job.  The proponents of the deal say they will be good jobs, and I believe they have done their due diligence, but if I am wrong here, at least some jobs will be created.  At the same time, supply chain requirements mean that many local materials and companies could receive new contracts.  I lived many years in Seattle and the regionally economy ALWAYS benefited when local airplane manufacturer Boeing did well.

Technology:  The biggest concern about the products are tied to performance.  Will these LED lights be as good as the fluorescent technology that we are using today, and will Sunpu-Opto’s products be as good as someone else.  First off, the LED technology is a no brainer.  Yes, it is an evolving technology, and could easily improve in the next 10 years.  We in the room were reassured that if we found better pricing, better technology, or better products that Sunpu-Opto would meet those criteria or we would be free to source elsewhere.  There were concerns about UL and Energy Star ratings, and the products that we will spec will be rated by these systems before we buy them.  Just like buying a new cell phone or a computer, waiting for the newest technology is never a win, as something better is always just around the corner.  In the meantime, we are free to pursue new technologies and Sunpu-Opto is committed to exploring new products and technologies that we demand or we are free to source them somewhere else.

The Deal: The biggest lament about this deal is that it is being called a “no bid contract.”  I think this is misleading.  An RFP was issued.  I am willing to admit that the RFP was probably issued based on what the company promised to provide us before it was issued.  But when a company makes a promise (quote/deal/offer) as long as it is opened up to other companies to meet those same specifications then it cannot be called “no bid.”  GE and an Akron based company both said they could meet the requirements, but never said they WOULD.  If they had, there would not be this issue.  I am especially perturbed that the entire issue is being blown up by GE and their LAWYERS.  They are making the biggest stink and they are the ones who have closed their local manufacturing plants and moved many of those jobs overseas.  (In truth, this is according to one of the attendees who researched this on her own).  What I do know is that GE bulbs are not built here and that they have not pursued LED technology fast enough as their competitors.  The city (and its residents) will have access to manufacturer direct pricing, full replacement warranties, and a meet or beat pricing strategy on streetlights, stop lights, and LED tubes and Edison-type bulbs.  There is already a plan in place to test the stop lights and street light before implementation.  The products being offered are also a plug in to existing fixture type of replacement that other companies cannot offer.  If GE is so concerned, why do they not even make a sensible counter offer to establish a manufacturing plant here?  Green Mill Global says it will, but with tax incentives not purchasing contracts.  The beauty of this deal is that the city has the ability to use something that is has never used before to attract a new company to the region.  Green Mill Global is looking at Akron or Cleveland, and if we win, Akron loses.  On the other hand, if we bring Sunpu-Opto, Green Mill Global will likely establish its manufacturing plant in Akron and we are adding even more jobs to the region and promoting competition.  The term of the contract is ten years.  While this may seem like a long time, the average life on an LED bulb is 7+ years, so it is not like we will be replacing them all the time.

The Company: Okay, I have never heard of Sunpu-Opto before either.  Not a big surprise, because I don’t know the names of other semi conductor companies either.  They are established in China and just starting in North America.  They seem to have a good track record, but there are risks.  Any deal with a payoff is a risk.  I think the risk is lower here than in giving a single owner the exclusive rights to build a casino in the heart of downtown with little in the way of tax requirements and jobs guarantees.  And we voted for that to happen-and have already been told it is going to be delayed!

Sustainability: LED bulbs will use less electricity to operate, and thus lower our carbon emissions.  What does it cost the city to become greener?  With this deal, even if we don’t get the promised jobs, and the savings don’t stack up as high as were promised, we will still lower our carbon footprint and that has its own non-monetary value.  As a city, we are trying to change our reputation to being a cleaner and greener city, not the “mistake on the lake.”  Every step forward to boost our reputation in this area is a good one.  Every step in this direction means that we have more clout and more visibility, making us more attractive to new industry and companies looking for new locations.  Oh, and did I mention that this company is committed to refurbishing and reusing an already existing building in the city?

The city council is scheduled to vote on this issue TOMORROW.  I encourage all of you to call, write, or email your council person and give them your thoughts on this issue.  Time is of the essence.  While many have stated we need more debate, and more time, that is not an option.  This company is looking to move forward and is now being wooed by competing cities.  Will this be the next project that was talked to the point of just going away?  I hope not and I encourage you to contact your council person now and let them know how you feel.  So you know how I feel, how about you?

Packaging, what a waste?

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

We can thank Wal-Mart for being a big bully and forcing their suppliers to reduce packaging, thereby reducing shipping costs.  If it weren’t for Wal-Mart, we wouldn’t even have concentrated detergent.  But what is happening with the packages for products that don’t grace the shelves of the mega store?  Is there any way for stores (buyers) to even know what packaging the products are coming in?  Is there any way for the consumer to know if the packaging is putting off toxic gases, or was produced by forced child labor in some third-world country?

Here are the problems tracking packaging:  First, packaging is produced from a variety of materials such as cardboard, plastics, metals, etc., and similar products may use different packaging.  Different sizes of the same products may also use completely different packaging.

Second, packaging doesn’t really come from the maker of the product, it comes from companies called “converters”, so the product manufacturer’s focus is not on the packaging at all.  The converters determine the best way to package the product, tying into the product manufacturer’s marketing scheme.   Converters do not sell packaging in the consumer marketplace, they sell it to brand owners and retailers who then put their products into the packaging and then into the market.  Consumers may look to the retailers and brand owners for information or control of the packaging, but they don’t typically have the answers.

Third, sustainability, toxicity, and fair labor are not usual concerns for a product manufacturer or retailer when they are thinking about packaging.  Plus, there has not been any way to track such things.  Since packaging is often disposed of after the use or delivery of a product, a common perception is that packaging is largely waste.

So finally we have the Sustainability Packaging Project in the U.S. (and the International Global Packaging Project in France) which have come up with a matrix for rating the sustainability of packaging.  It ranks packaging on 8 criteria: Material Use, Energy Use, Water Use, Material Health, Clean Production & Transportation, Cost & Performance, Community Impact and Worker Impact.  Each of these criterion are broken down into categories.

The Material Use criterion includes: raw material reduction, material waste, virgin vs. recycled content.  It even takes it a step further by defining percentages of post-consumer recycled content vs. post-industrial.

Probably the most unusual criteria for a sustainability matrix are Community Impact and Worker Impact.  The Community Impact criterion includes: Product safety and recalls, recycling and reuse, landfills, shelf-life and community investment.  The Worker Impact criterion includes: Child labor, forced or compulsory labor, collective bargaining and freedom of association, discrimination, excessive work hours, remuneration, occupational health, safety performance and responsible workplace practices.

As product “converters” begin to produce packaging, they will be individually ranked according to these protocols.  Manufacturers, Consumers and Retailers will begin to become aware of the rankings.  Eventually, many groups, manufactureres, retailers, and governmental bodies will demand certain ratings for products.  This is one of the goals of the Global Packaging Project.