Posts Tagged ‘Green Policies’

Cleveland Sustainability Summit-Day 1

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

Being the first day of the meteor shower, I crawled out of bed early to get a glimpse. i had heard that the pre-dawn hours would give the best show. Unfortunately, there was simply too much light pollution and clouds to see a thing. Since I was up early, though, I had time to dress up a little for my first day at the green summit-Sustainable Cleveland 2019: Building an Economic Engine to Empower a Green City on a Blue Lake. I have been looking forward to this for weeks and was glad to be included in it.

First off, it is being held in the Cleveland Convention Center. I have been to an event there before, and I know that it really does not work for conventions. The building is in dire need of updating and refurbishing, and then would still not work very well for the modern conventions that Cleveland hopes to attract. That being said, this was the first time I had seen the inside of the main auditorium and it is beautiful; a little tatty, perhaps, but beautiful all the same. I want a new convention center, but I hate to see this gem destroyed the way that Playhouse Square was nearly torn down, and the way the Cleveland Hippodrome actually was. Once it is gone, it is gone forever and we will never get it back. While there is so much open property around Cleveland’s downtown, why should we be tearing down old world craftsmanship. Why not start over and use a lovely piece of property that is currently a surface lot. Better yet, why not use the stalled Flats project land that is already bull-dozed and ready for use? Anyhow, I digress…

The day started with a little coffee and a chance to say hello to all the hardest working “greenies” in the city. Andrew Watterson got us all seated. With a group of 500-700 people, Andrew and his team deserve a medal for getting this thing together. He introduced Mayor Jackson, who spoke about the need for this summit and why he had called on all of us to be there. We are at a critical time, and to really remake Cleveland, we need the community to come together and do its part. This isn’t just about government or non-profits, it is about big business, small business, educators, the media, youth, students, technical sectors and even the arts. I was glad to see all those groups (and more) represented in the room. Mayor Jackson’s remarks were followed by Barbara Snyder, the president of Case Western Reserve University.

The most inspiring 15 minutes of the morning came from Van Jones, from the White House Office of Environmental Quality. Some of the things he said blew me away, and reminded me why i voted for Barak Obama. This kind of thinking could not have come from the previous administration. He talked about his 1 year old son. If over the previous year, their son had a fever of 1 degree, he and his wife would be concerned. Two degrees and they would be anxious. Three and they would be on the phone to call the doctor. After all, this child of theirs is a finely designed system. It takes care of itself. If something goes wrong, something needs to be done before it is too late. Like a child, our planet is a finely tuned system that will take care of itself. But something is wrong, and as the temperature goes up, we should be truly concerned. Of course, he was eloquent and thoughtful, and I cannot quote him word for word. Since some people say we cannot worry about the environment, while we are concentrating on the economy, Mr Jones explained why we cannot afford not to act to save the environment. If we continue on this path, we are likely to see water levels on Lake Erie drop. That would mean a loss of over $1 billion in commerce on the lake. We could potentially lose $5 billion in farming and agriculture; another $5 billion in forestry; and untold billions in loss of revenue from tourism. He did praise our efforts so far: Ohio is in the top ten in the country for green jobs; we are #7 in patents for clean energy technology; and rank in the top 20 for venture capital in clean tech. We need to grow our green economy to create jobs because, “the best social program is a job. Nothing stops a bullet, like a job.” Truly inspiring.

Between speakers, we worked in groups during break out sessions and reported back to the crowd. We were treated to students who had won awards, who read us their prize winning essays on green subjects. Nothing gives you hope more than the next generation creating a buy-in! Other speakers included David Cooperrider of the Fowler Center and Weatherhead School of Management (who spoke about the return for investors of green businesses like GE, and Whole Foods was over 1000% while the S&P returns were only about 125%), Dr Peter Senge from MIT, and Marc Lautenbach GM of IBM. The day was finished off with an innovation panel with Miquela Craytor (Sustainable South Bronx), Lynette Young (City of Atlanta), Jeff Baldassari (of Bedford-based Taylor Companies), Catherine Gutowski (GE) and Ray Anderson (Interface). It was the perfect way to round out the day. I like hearing what other cities and companies are doing that is cool and exciting.

The one point that Dr. Senge spoke about really reflects my personal feelings about sustainability. We really need to think about whole systems when it comes to “green.” It is no longer about this product or that. Even Coke had missed that the sugar that they bought had its own carbon and water cost. It takes nearly a ton of extracted materials, per day, per person to maintain the lifestyle of the average American. It is devastating to think of all the natural resources we use, and how much we simply waste. Europe is ahead of us. Did you know that in most European countries, when a car reaches the end of it’s life, it must be recycled by the company that manufactured it. It changes the whole equation when a company has to deal with its own product when it is dead. It is this shift in thinking that we need to adopt if there is to be real and lasting change to the way that we do business.

All this and it is only Day1!

Amplify

Making money and being green are not mutually exclusive.

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

I found this video on You Tube, and found it interesting. Take a look…

Amplify

Cleveland prepares for its Sustainability Summit, still time to win!

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

I spent some time talking with Andrew Watterson of the Department of Sustainability of the City of Cleveland.  We were at an event as a sort of “pre-summit happy hour” for those planning on attending.  The group was diverse.  We talked about the roll out of the recycle program and I expressed my opinion that we need to step it up.  I never miss an opportunity to tell someone employed by the city that we need to step up our recycling program.  More interesting was the expectations for the upcoming summit.  He let me know that there are a variety of demographics and sectors to be included in this process.  Some people are being turned down, despite their obvious ability to contribute valuable to the outcome.  Truth is, this is about including everyone.  Local business, as well as non-profit and government; young and old.  How I managed to wrangle an invitation, I will never know, but I am thrilled to be included.  What would you say, if you were to participate in this summit?  Of course, first and foremost in my mind is recycling. Other things that are on my mind include:  Stormwater Runoff, we need to fix our aging infrastructure and find a way to keep sewage out of Lake Erie;  Alternative Energy, can we get cheap clean energy from the sun and the lake; Public Transportation, finding a way to make it better and more inclusive-especially as we plan to renovate the I-90 bridge;  Incentives for New Business in the City, reusing existing buildings and infrastructure and luring green businesses to the region.  What else, should be included.  As I understand it, this summit will use the Appreciate Inquiry method to actually formulate public policy.  Let your voice be heard.  Comment here or drop me an email at:  robert@thegldc.com and I will try to get your opinion heard.

print1We are still waiting for more comments for the giveaway for a framed print.  Go here to read the post, but to encourage you, here is the print I am going to give away.  It is an 8×10 framed black and white print of Lincoln Park in Tremont. This contest end on Wednesday (Aug 12), as the summit starts that day!

Amplify

Hog judging and recycling

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

img048We have spent most of the last week visiting various locations in central Ohio.  Relatives from Kansas were visiting and we had a grand time showing them various things around Cleveland and Columbus.  A lot of things were discussed about this great region that we live in.  It was mentioned how lush and green Ohio was.  Of all the things that were likely to come up, that is not one I was expecting.  It is true, though.  Perhaps that is why I find it so easy to live here.  Like Portland, Oregon, Ohio is a pretty green state.  There are plenty of trees and nice hills and foliage.  Growing up in the windswept plains of central Kansas, I love to be near my trees.  Another discussion, we had was the rich heritage that Ohio can claim.  In the Victorian age, Ohio was a rich and the region very important.  Just travel to any small town and see the quality of buildings that are till standing.  Every town has a public square and and most a courthouse that rivals Cleveland.  Nearly every small town we visited had a row of fine mansions that was the heart of the industrialists of the area.  What can we do to bring this type of prosperity back to Ohio?  Our attempts to reinvent the region as a new green economy could make all the difference.

Knox Couty Fair recycles

Knox Couty Fair recycles

While near Apple Valley, we attended the Hog Judging at the Knox County Fair. No, we didn’t go just for the hog judging, but it was still interesting to watch. We also watched the alpaca obstacle course (who knew there was such a thing), but left before the calf penning. The fair midway was the usual line up of deep fried sugary snacks and shredded meat products. What surprised me the most was the recycling. Nearly every garbage can was also partnered with a recycling bag. When we attend events in Cleveland, and most other areas, there is not a recycling bin to be found. At one event, we asked them to produce one, and someone went and got a bin from the office that was likely used for office paper. More than once I personally removed garbage from this bin, so the recycling could still be recycled, but I fear that in the end it was all sent to landfill anyhow. This leads me to wonder how a sophisticated group of urbanites in Cleveland cannot even grasp the simple concept of recycling, when the small town folks and farmers of Knox county had no issues. One thing that I hold onto is the matter of priorities. When a city makes recycling a priority, it makes it know to its citizens that recycling is important. It educates them and lets them know that it is taken seriously. So few of our residents in this town get recycling privileges, that when they are out and about, they don’t even think to look for a recycling bin. If there were to be one, how would they know what to put in it? I agree that there has to be priorities in city government, and that public safety outweighs recycling needs. At the same time, with out a comprehensive recycling program, are we just “greenwashing” on a governmental scale?  With creativity and a strong will, we could find a way to recycle more in this town without sacrificing other alternatives.  One option would be to privatize the recycling program.  Without even spending a dime of its own money, a city could award a contract to pick up recycling and the company that does it could keep the profits from selling the recyclables.  If I can come up with that off the top of my head, surely the great minds in the region can come up with many more.  Send your ideas to your mayor or city council.

Amplify

Are you buying the right stuff? Top “green” companies to support!

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

We all want to be greener.  Sometimes it just isn’t that easy.  But sometimes, it is easier than you think.  Some of your favorite companies are doing the right things, and all you have to do is keep buying their stuff.  Of course a little letter of encouragement often goes a long way, too.

Pepsi or Coke?  The age old dilemma.  Today, it doesn’t really matter.  Pepsi is a strong supporter of equality rights, so they sit close to my heart.  PepsiCo is also one of the top 3 buyers of renewable energy in the country.  Not to be left out, Coca Cola has stepped up its commitment to the environment.  They are in the midst of an aggressive rainwater capture program.  Furthermore, they have reduced water usage in production by over 20% and more in some divisions.  They are also on board the 2020 program that so many companies and cities are taking part in.  THeir goal: reduce carbon emissions by 15% by 2020.  Either way, your cola is a relatively “green” drink.

When is comes to groceries, there are still lots of options.  Whole Foods purchases enough wind credits to cover all of their electricity needs.  I love Whole Foods for its commitment ot to environment, but also its commitment to its staff and customers.  You can feel pretty comfortable about shopping there.  They take out the guess work for you by researching the products that they carry, and implementing strict controls on the companies that supply them.  But if there isn’t one near you, do not fear.  There are still many other options that are suitable.  Safeway is a leader in purchasing renewables and in carbon emission reductions.  They also have a great selection of LEED certified stores and have recently expanded their commitment to local foods and carry a large selection of locally grown produce.  They also operate other chains like Dominic’s.  Wegman’s is another grocery store chain with strong environmental concerns.  Fresh and Easy Markets are another strong choice.  And like it or not, Wal-Mart is promising to be using all renewable energy in its corporation by . If you don’t care for Wal Mart, consider the Starbuck’s conundrum.  While as a company they are vocal about their environmental policies and are often touted as a green company.  At the same time, they no longer use reusable utensils, will not recycle in many areas (like Cleveland) and have yet to address the issues of water waste that they have.  I agree that their paper sleeve has reduced paper cup consumption, but is that enough to get on the top lists? Stick to Peet’s or Green Mountain!Don’t discount Target or Trader Joe’s as they are up there as great choices as well. In consumer goods, I was surprised to also see Kohl’s, Gap, Microsoft and IKEA listed in the Natural Health magazine’s choices of top companies.

Who wants an iPhone? ME! Still, I have a strong relationship with Verizon Wireless and want to stick with them. If they were to offer phone services in my area, I would be on it in a heartbeat. This strong relationship was backed up by Verizon appearing on the list of Natural Health Magazines finalist for the Green Choice Awards.

A company that is trying to make some significant changes is Nike. In addition to its recycle program (they collect old shoes and turn them into new shoes that they donate to underprivileged individuals) they have stated that they plan to discontinue the use of leather from the amazon rain forest. Beef production in South America is one of the biggest contributors to the slash and burn policies of the Amazon. Miles of this wilderness are disappearing everyday, and we need to support companies who refuse to promote this destruction. While I am no big fan of Crocs as a personal footwear choice, I am really pleased with all the work that they have done in humanitarian efforts. In addition to charitable giving, they are often first in disaster relief efforts to provide new shoes. I have also heard that they will take bake old Croc shoes and recycle them into new for donation in third world countries.

Companies that have made top lists that produce many of the products that you buy already include:

Kraft, E&J Gallo, Apple, GE, Lowe’s, Odwalla, Peet’s, Method, and Burt’s Bees.

Natural Food company choices that you may not be as familiar with include:

Hain’s Celestial Group, Tom’s of Maine, Organic Valley, Kashi and Clif Bar.

See the top 25 finalist of Natural Health Magazine. See the list of the top 35 green companies by Earthsense.

Amplify

How can we make our lake really blue?

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

Lake Erie. When it is clean, it is a joy. There is plenty of recreation available and parks on the lakefront. Furthermore, we are trying (still) to commit to a new and exciting lakefront development. Unfortunately, when we get a good rain like we have had recently, you have to worry about how much raw sewage is overflowing into our beautiful lake. When the city is cash strapped, who is out watching the lake to watch for illegal dumping? What about our aging Port Authority complex that has NO system for dealing with rainwater runoff? Everytime it rains, the majority of the oil stained, dirty asphalt of the city’s port area is washed clean…and into the lake.

The Great Lakes

The Great Lakes

President Obama has a budget for 2010. In it he has allocated nearly $500 million for the first stages of cleanup of the Great Lakes Region. What can we expect from this amount of cash? We have a lot to do to fix our collection of lakes. To get the party started, the US EPA is holding a series of meetings around the region. In Cleveland, you should plan on attending the meeting in Cleveland Heights. The meeting is July 27, 2009, 6-8pm at the Canal Way Center, State Boat Landing Room 4524 E 49th St Cuyahoga Heights, OH 44125-1008. Please join me and make your voice heard. We can talk about lakefront development for another 10 years, but we need to deal with the issues of the lake right now! If you want more info about this meeting, or one closer to you (if you live outside Ohio) then check out their website.

Among the other issues that we are facing in cleaning up our lake, are the invasive species that are damaging the ecosystem. Fish are brought in by ships from other waters in their bilge tanks. Once in the lakes, they thrive without their natural predators and push out native animal and fish species. Don’t forget that we have also destroyed much of the local habitat through industry over the years, and allowed manufacturing to pour tons of chemicals into our water streams that are still lingering about. I do worry about what will happen, as the lake is an important source of wildlife, nature, and drinking water. We need to take care of it, now that we have mucked it up. I am all for developing the waterfront. It could be a great economic draw to the region. The issue that concerns me is that the port Authority is currently not managing its storm water runoff, so what is the plan for managing debris, and pollution during their proposed move and the development of the property that is currently their home? Once again, I fear that our lackluster attitude, and our inability to demand that things be handled properly on our local level will be our downfall. Maybe with the help of the EPA, we can start some new enforcement and new momentum toward a cleaner, safer and bluer lake.

Won’t you join me and have your voice heard?

Amplify

Green is not black and white…

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

You want to be green, right? You want a checklist of all the things to do and buy and then you can sit back and finally relax. Sorry, kids, it is simply not that easy. Being green means work. It means being on the lookout. It means making meaningful choices and doing it over and over again. The answers are simply not black and white. Green is a gray area.

First off, I have read articles of people who live off the grid. Some raise sheep and make their own cloth, compost their own feces and never drive a car. Good for them. Deep in my heart, a part of me wants to be them. Part of me wants to throw off the shackles of modern life and spend the remainder of my days meditating in an ashram until I die and my body is left out to be pecked apart by the birds of the mountains. It ain’t gonna happen. Since you are reading this, it means that you are living here in the modern world as well. Unless you are generating your own electricity by stationary bicycle, you may be able to get something our of this.

What does being sustainable really mean? Ask 10 people and you are likely to get ten different answers. I have developed my own working definition that fits me and my life. Sustainability, to me, means making the best possible choices for both me and the rest of the planet, based on the information that I have available at the time. This means that I try to do the right things.

wwiip44I try to drive less and walk more. We could sell the car. Many people live without them. We live in Cleveland, though and I have to get around. I cannot run our business or even really get as much done in life without one. However, we drive a fuel efficient car. We try to walk more and shop locally. We combine trips and try to carpool when we can. I also bought us bikes, and hope to bike more. Being aware of the amount of gas we use is important and allows us to make decisions about when and where we will go. While not driving at all is the greenest thing, that is not going to happen. Buying a hybrid would be green, but using an old car that is still functioning and getting over 30 mpg and not having to build a new car just for us is even greener, in my opinion. When the car no longer gets decent gas mileage, or starts to fall apart, then we can make that decision.

I eat a lot less meat. I buy cage free eggs that are not fed hormones. Everybody eats. Everybody poops. Everybody. So when I buy my food, I try to buy items that are locally grown. I try to support stores that have local produce. I spend the extra buck on cage free, hormone free eggs, because it is something that I believe in and I stand by that no matter where I shop. I eat less meat and look for grass fed beef, because grass fed cows give off less methane and contribute less to global warming. I always buy TP with recycled content, and 100% unless it is not available.

I choose the most eco friendly products that I can. I try to buy products with the least packaging. Organic cotton items are often out of my price range, but I get them when I can. Vinyl has issues, so I try to avoid it. Plastics are a necessary evil in life today, but I look for the recycle symbol on things and given the choice, I buy the better option. Or sometimes I do not buy at all…

I shop less and I weigh my options when I spend my dollars. When we put in a new floor, I wanted an eco friendly product like bamboo. But is bamboo really that eco friendly when it has to come all the way from China? I shop at Wal Mart because of the things they are doing to green their stores and their supply chains, but I am always aware of past labor violations. I also am aware that so much of their product selection is cheap and will fall apart in a week. Instead, I would rather buy from a less eco friendly retailer and buy something that will not need to be replaced soon. I also think about the things that I buy and ask myself if I can get it used. The greenest items are the ones that are never produced at all.

So there are no easy answers, no one size fits all. You have your life and have to make the choices that you need to to live it. But there are always options and you have to make the best ones for you. Is it better to buy a greener product made by a company with human rights abuses? Or a product that is bad for the environment that that has no animal testing? Do you support local farmers who use pesticides, or a corporate farm that grows organic, in Mexico? Dig deep and spend your money wisely, and as you do, you will find that there are good and bad in most of the choices that you make. Choose the greenest answer and it won;t always be black and white, but sorta gray.

Amplify

Urge your council to support recycling-just in time for the summit!

Monday, July 13th, 2009

If you live in the city of Cleveland, then either you have curbside recycling, or you don’t.  Either way, contact your city councilperson and the mayor.  Tell them you want to have a citywide curbside recycling and mandated recycling at all events that require a city permit.  It is easy.  I am sick of having to drag my recycling down to the nearest bin, but that is not the reason for this particular rant.  I was asked by a colleague of mine what to do about recycling all their old magazines.  Now this is a smart guy.  Problem is, since we have made is so difficult for residents to recycle and even worse for commercial customers, that even the brightest residents haven’t all followed through.  We have not taken the minimal time and effort to educate the public that they can recycle metal, paper, newspapers, magazines, cardboard and plastics at their local Cleveland recycles dumpsters.  If you do not know where your nearest site is, look at the city listing. This site has much more information as well, like a recycle guide-what to recycle and where to do it. It is great information, but I rarely hear about it… The other reason that I am on this tirade is that I am sick of the public events in this town not having recycling at the most basic level. I went to a Port Authority meeting last week to discuss the lakefront project. (BTW this project looks great and we need to get started on it-plan on attending the August meeting!) They served food, which was delicious, and a selection of sodas. I can understand them not being prepared to recycle the plates or cutlery, but at least two of us had to ask about a recycle bin before one appeared for the aluminum cans.

img040This weekend the difference between Cleveland and Cleveland Heights was made glaringly obvious. I attended the Cain Park Art Fair. The park had recycling cans available throughout the area. Judging by their appearance, they have been serving the public for a while now.  Moreover, the visitors and exhibitors alike were dutifully dropping their cans and bottles inside and I didn’t wee a single wadded up wrapper or paper make it in.  That means the residents of Cleveland Heights know what they are doing.  They have been schooled on at least the basics and they understand that a recycling program must be followed or it will not work.  In contrast, if you put a recycling bin at nearly any Cleveland area event, and it is half full of garbage and dumped out anyhow.

I also attended Ingenuity Fest.  ingenuity-fest1This is a great event (more on this later, as well-I am trying to stay on topic).  But for a Cleveland event that was based on ingenuity and new ideas, why could I not find a simple recycling bin for a water bottle ANYWHERE? The irony was not lost on me.  Besides the vendors and their waste, I saw a lot of attendees looking around for their spot to dump their can and choosing the garbage-it wasn’t really a choice anyway.  So for a city that is promoting ingenuity, we couldn’t be enough on the edge to even put out a recycle bin?  More than that, we keep talking about a Green City on a Blue Lake, but we aren’t going to take the step of requiring permit holders for public events to even provide a single recycle bin?  Now that is downright lazy if you ask me.  So, here is my plan.  I am attending the Cleveland Sustainability Summit in August.  It is going to be a big deal.  I request that everyone send their councilperson and the mayor a brief not asking them to start curbside recycling thorough out the city and to mandate public events permits issued with recycling bin requirements.

Here is the link to the Mayor Frank Jackson’s office. or email him directly at mayorsactioncenter@city.cleveland.oh.us

Try contacting his cabinet, too. They are all listed here.

Here are your City Council members:
Ward 1 Terrell Pruitt: ward01@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 2 Nate Wilkes: ward02@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 3 Zachary Reed: ward03@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 4 Kenneth Johnson: ward04@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 5 Phyllis Cleveland: ward05@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 6 Mamie Mitchell: ward06@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 7 TJ Dow: ward07@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 8 Shari Cloud: council8office@sbcglobal.net
Ward 9 Kevin Conwell: ward09@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 10 Eugene Miller: ward10@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 11 Michael Polensek: ward11@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 12 Anthony Brancatelli: abrancatelli@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 13 Joe Cimperman: ward13@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 14 Joe Santiago: jsantiago@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 15 Brian Cummings: ward15@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 16 Kevin Kelly: ward16@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 17 Matt Zone: councilward17@sbcglobal.net
Ward 18 Jay Westbrook: ward18@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 19 Dona Brady: ward19@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 20 Martin Sweeney: ward20@clevelandcitycouncil.org
Ward 21 Martin Keene: ward21@clevelandcitycouncil.org

Just in case you don’t have an ideas on what to say, here is some sample text. Simple copy and paste into your email browser:

Dear Cleveland City Councilperson/Mayor:

As we strive to become a truly Green City on a Blue Lake, I think it is of utmost importance that we address the issue of recycling in the city of Cleveland. The savings on tipping fees and transportation of garbage, coupled with increased revenue from the sale of recyclables will more that off set the initial outlay of funds to implement a city wide program now. I understand that their is a program in place to roll out our program over 6 years, but if we act now, we can save money and increase our standing in the national community. Being able to market ourselves as a world class destination for tourism and business relocation is of the utmost importance. Not having a comprehensive recycling program merely tarnishes our reputation. I urge you to make recycling a priority in the city’s agenda. Furthermore, I would urge you to tie all city permits for public events and festivals to, at the very least, providing recycling bins as an alternative to garbage cans throughout the event. Our large events and festivals often draw large crowds from outside the city and by requiring recycling bins at these events, we are increasing the visibility of our commitment to recycling and greening our city and region.
Thank you.

Okay, I gave you the links and the words, all you have to do is cut and paste…now please help me out! I will bring this up as many times as possible at the Sustainability Summit in August. By the way, if you are not in Cleveland, feel free to contact our mayor and let him know what your city is doing about recycling and how you feel about it. After you email someone in the city government, write a comment here, telling me who you wrote to, and I will enter you in a drawing for a nice framed print!

Amplify

More layoffs, less plastic bags….Time for a rethink!

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

Local architecture firm, KA has had yet another round of layoffs. This time they cut pretty deep, laying off shareholders. Could this spell the end of a Cleveland institution? While I do not know the ins and outs of the company or its financial statements, I am aware that the development and architecture industry in Cleveland has taken a pretty big hit in Cleveland that last few years. It has caused me to think about the future of the city and what we will be doing as we move forward. KA is an architecture firm that has been around for decades. Recently they have received some great awards for their designs by AIA, ICSC, and Cleveland Restoration Society. They should be thriving. So why the deep cuts and desperate lay offs? Is this a sign of the times or simply a bump in the road? Now let’s take a look at the Flats. The project slated for the East Bank of The Flats was the golden ticket to Cleveland’s future. It was going to change the downtown landscape, bring new business, and jump start a new era of prosperity in downtown Cleveland. As I drove by that area the other day, I had to pause. While it is true that the credit crisis is responsible for the slow down of development in this major project, why was so much of the existing building stock simply razed? Our rapid transit to the waterfront has been all but abandoned. Remaining buildings are all but empty and the entire area is a ghost town. If this is Cleveland’s future, then it is a bleak one… As I look at the stock prices of local developers and others in the building trades, I am forced to concede that these are indeed dire times for some of our biggest players.

So what does this mean for Cleveland? I think it is representation of our region as a whole. It has become time for this area, and other major areas to stop the in fighting and start thinking of the future of the city, the region and all our citizens. While we argue about the mall site, or Tower City for the new Convention Center and Medical Mart, similar ideas are being proposed in other cities. While we discuss and debate, New York is looking at their own concept of a medical mart. Other cities are beefing up their convention centers and we rattle on. When the project finally gets built, will it be too late to actually make an impact on Cleveland’s future? What about the responsibilities of Merchandise Mart Properties? Now that we have already allowed Woolstein to raze most of the flats and we are left with a huge mud patch, have we set a precedence for other companies? What if the economy takes another turn, will we have an empty Medical Mart and allow the operators to walk away scot free? It is my humble opinion, that if we have a huge mud pit with ample room, that we could easily build a convention center there. Let us simply get moving and stop the endless babble. Much like our local companies that refuse to change, if we hang on to the way of thinking and do not start to think outside the box, we are in for more rounds of layoffs (we just laid off 2 council members and it looks as if we will be laying off a couple more in a few years…). I look at our history. We tore down a beautiful Hippodrome. We destroyed a host of beautiful buildings in the name of progress. What stands there today? Some of the largest open parking lots I have ever seen. We need to start thinking of our city as a valuable asset. Our downtown real estate is too valuable to allow developers to tear it up and leave it. Are we destined to have a huge Flats Parking? We need to start thinking of Cleveland as a great town, and as such, stop bowing down to the pressures of corporate interests who may do little or nothing in the end for this town. If we want to be a “Green City on a Blue Lake” we need to institute tough legislation on recycling (especially for commercial properties) and stop the lip service. In these tough economic times, those companies who refuse to embrace change and take this opportunity to reinvent themselves risk being left behind while more nimble newcomers take away market share. Cleveland is in the same boat. If we do not take this chance to really make a real change in how we operate, we risk losing the momentum that we have started and will fall back to being the “mistake on the lake.”

What do I propose? While not being an economist or a public official, I am very opinionated. Here are some of my suggestions. I am sure that I am alone on some of them, but at least they represent some “out of the box” thinking that is needed to really get things moving in this town.

Implement a mandatory 5 cent charge on all plastic bags used at retail outlets. According to Supermarket News, Metro Inc (of Montreal) started a 5 cent bag charge in all its outlets and plastic bag use was reduced by 70%.
Immediately begin a comprehensive curbside recycling service to ALL areas of the city and impose fines for those who do not recycle. It works in San Francisco, and even Lakewood, so why not here? The savings in tipping fees will pay for the roll out and the savings in fuel costs for transporting garbage to a landfill some 40 miles away will pay for the ongoing costs. Furthermore, new business opportunities will be available. Resale of of used goods would increase and new shops could be opened.
Mandate deconstruction over demolition of existing buildings. Materials could be reused and new businesses started, like architectural salvage and used building materials. Along with that, mandate that all houses that are abandoned and not up to code must be repaired or become the property of the city. These homes could be deconstructed and the income generated from sale of the materials could stimulate the local economy. The city would then own viable property in landbank that could be sold at auction to developers and private owners for reuse.
Offer true tax incentives that attract new businesses to the city. Make them valuable and real. Furthermore, make them based on job creation and structured so that businesses see the advantages of staying in the region for longer periods (i.e. make them revocable if job creation does not stay at a desired level for 5 or 10 years).
Offer tax incentives for business that reuse large empty buildings inside city limits. The old Hugo Boss factory and Ashbury Court buildings have been empty and an eyesore for at least a decade, with no incentive to have them utilized. The Jay Hotel is sitting empty in a prime Ohio City location waiting for rehab.
Make all real estate transactions with the city transparent and rehab programs public knowledge. No more behind the scenes dealings.
Make developers use the land they buy (yes, the flats) and impose fines for not following through. This will stop things like the flats from being razed and left empty. Furthermore, make parking lots pay extra taxes for their underutilized lots. Any lots in the city limits that is used for paid parking must pay by lot size. This sill ensure dense structure. Parking lot operators will have to build upwards to make their lots more viable and the city will benefit from the taxes imposed. This will also free us from the grip of parking lot operators who refuse to sell or develop the large open lots in valuable areas (like the middle of downtown), by making them build up or lose the profitability of their current location.

While some of these things may seem crazy, I see benefits to all of them. Until we move out of our current comfort zone, we cannot expect real progress and prosperity in this city.

Amplify

Consumers are insisting on greener packaging and healthier foods!

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

The research is coming in from many sources, and it is intriguing. I have been discussing the topic of consumer priorities with a professional in the industry via the web. I wanted to do a little research and find out if my perceptions were on target or totally off base. I was pleased to find plenty of information on consumer demand and what corporations are doing to fulfill those demands.

First I read a study from Ipsos Marketing. Like a good consumer, before sharing their findings, I looked them up and found they had a good reputation, so the data they present is reliable. They asked consumers the one area that companies needed to focus on when developing new feed products. The results were that consumers were more interested in fresh ingredients, additional health benefits, and more environmentally friendly packaging should be top priorities. Their data suggests that consumers are more interested in health, both of the body and the environment, than they are are in convenience or new and different. This information is derived from respondents around the world, not just the US or Europe. When asked to prioritize the #1 area to concentrate on, respondents averaged about 25% each for freshness, health benefits and enviro-friendly packaging. On the other hand, new and different products, convenient packaging and “quick and easy” each ranked at less than 6%. This reflects a big change over the end of the 1990′s.

Trends are showing that locally grown produce is the hottest thing in 2009, according to The National Restaurant Association. Whether that is due to taste, quality, value or environment has yet to be seen. I know that the people that I talk to on this point, say it is all of those things. Locally grown produce is simply better. It has a lower carbon footprint, is usually cheaper, and has the benefit of being fresher and better tasting. That means it falls into the concerns of the consumers mentioned above. Furthermore, the NRA says that restaurants are planning to invest some dollars in green initiatives. 40% of full service restaurants and nearly 30% of quick service will invest in green this year. Consumers are doing the same, but in a more concerned way. They are spending less on organics as food budgets have shrunk, but more in green areas that will save them money in the long run-like Energy Star appliances. Moreover, they will invest in simple things that can have an overall impact, like buying and using durable reusable shopping bags instead of plastic.

How do we really feel about the buying decisions that we make? According to a BBMG study, 77% of participants said that they believed that they could make a positive influence on the world by the buying decisions that they made. &2% have said they “punished” companies by not buying their products if they did not align with their core values. We are a mouthy bunch, too. 55% said that they have told others to buy products that were environmentally or socially responsible. Likewise, 48% told others to avoid companies whose practices they didn’t agree with. Furthermore, the internet gets that word around. 28% have said they post recommendations and reviews on blogs, message boards and social sites.

Deloitte paired with GMA to produce a report on Green Shopping Insights. Theis is the most comprehensive survey, as they interviewed over 6,000 shoppers at 11 major retailers. The report is a long 28 pages, but some of the key messages can be had in the executive summary:

Sustainability considerations either drive or influence the buying decisions of more than half the shoppers interviewed in our study. However, for most green shoppers, sustainability considerations are an important purchase driver, but secondary to other dominant purchase drivers. For most shoppers sustainable considerations become a tie-breaker when other factors are in relative parity. Because of this effect, sustainability characteristics drive a relatively large amount of product switching. Once a more sustainable product has captured the shopper’s commitment it tends to create brand stickiness by retaining the shopper’s loyalty through repurchase…
A significant minority of committed and proactive green shoppers are willing to pay more for green products, however, the larger potential population of shoppers that lean towards green want price and performance parity for sustainable products because it is not their dominant purchase driver…
We learned that there is an unfulfilled, latent demand for green products that could be realized through increased product development, in-store communication, and product availability.

The bad thing about surveys is that one can always wonder if responses are based on what the asker wants to hear. Regardless of the whys and whether or not consumers will actually do the things that they day they will, corporations believe they will. Companies across the globe are working hard to reduce emissions and provide more eco friendly products. Many grocery stores have begun reducing or eliminating plastic bags all together. Wal Mart has a goal to use 100% renewable power and be a zero waste company. They are reducing packaging in their supply chain and increasing recycling across the corporation. In fact, it has been said that to reduce shipping, Wal Mart is single-handedly responsible for the extra concentrated laundry and dish detergents that are available today. They are adding organic clothes and foods. They are expanding their seafood to be more sustainable. In some areas they are treating water and garbage in areas where there isn’t enough to begin with. Marks & Spencer is using 18% less packaging and food trays now have recycled content. DuPont is even giving awards for innovation in product packaging. All of this points to satisfying a savvy consumer with a demand for greener products.

Amplify