Posts Tagged ‘windows’

Save energy with new shades…

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

This is a product that is genius in its simplicity.  I was first turned on to these shades by a friend of mine.  So here is the basic gist.  Lovely roman shades that are insulated to cut down on heating costs.  Thin enough to be attractive, insulated enough to be high performance.  That is it.  Custom made, so they fit your windows perfectly.   Made from a product known as Thinsulate, a product common in sporting goods (think winter coats for skiers, etc) so it is sure to insulate well without being too bulky.  They stay sealed to window with a small track, and this cuts down on drafts.

According to their website:

HeatSaver® provides Nine Times the insulation of Single Glazed Windows. Four
Times
 the insulation of both Double Glazed and High Performance Windows.

They come in a variety of fabric choices.  These seem like a great investment.  They sent me a pdf of testimonials, so someone seems happy with them.  I think about the fact that we live in Cleveland.  Like many others, our house is old and has drafty windows.  Being a Victorian, the main floor windows are six feet tall and 2 1/2 feet wide.  In order to replace the windows with more energy efficient ones, they need to be wood framed to stay in keeping with the home’s architectural style.  Cost is a huge factor here.  I learned a couple of years ago, that by hanging new drapes that were heavier we were able to keep more UV summer heat and more cold drafty winter air out.  A product like this that seems to be more insulative and seas closer to the casing might be exactly what we need to cut down on those winter heating costs.

I know it is hard to think about winter gas bills in 80 degree July, but now is the best time to get going on a project that will same you big bucks in energy costs over time.  I am told there is a tax deduction for home installation as well as a break for commercial applications.  Summer cooling costs are not cheap around here with increases in utilities.  Check out the Heat Saver Thermal Shades website.

For my fellow geeks, here is some sciency stuff:

 

Test Data for HeatSaver® Thermal Shades
At the end of February 2011 a HeatSaver® Thermal Shade specimen underwent clinical
testing at the Architectural Testing facility in St. Paul, MN. The sample shade used
consisted of a Thinsulate® C150 core with layers of 1/2 mil aluminized mylar on either
side, finished with standard cotton polyester lining and 300 denier nylon. The tests,
NFRC 102-2010, are the most recent - and stringent - industry standard.
The glazed unit measured 47 1/4” wide x 59” tall (1200mm x 1499mm) and consisted of
2 layers of 1/8” DS Clear with a 1/4” dead air space, wrapped with an aluminum frame.
Thus it closely replicated a window configuration common from the 1960s onward.
Base Window Test Date: ! ! ! 02/22/11
Base with Attachment Test Date:! ! 02/23/11
Report Date:!! ! ! ! 03/23/11
Test Procedure: U-factor tests were performed in a Guarded Hot Box in accordance
with NFRC 102-2010, Test Procedure for Measuring the Steady-State Thermal
Transmittance of Fenestration Systems.
The average metering indoor air temperature established was 70.41 F. The average
cold side air temperature was -0.10 with a side wind velocity of 14.56 mph.
Test Duration - Base Window:
1. The test parameters for the base unit were considered stable for two consecutive four
hour periods on 02/21/11 and 02/22/11.
2. The thermal test results were derived over a four hour period on 02/22/11.
Test Duration - Base with Attachment:
1. The test parameters were considered stable for two consecutive four hour periods on
02/22/11 and 02/23/11.
2. The thermal performance test results were derived over a four hour period on
02/23/11.
Results
1. Thermal Transmittance of Test Specimen (Us)! ! 0.82 0.27 Btu/hr•ft2•F
2. Standardized Thermal Transmittance of Test Specimen (Ust) 0.75 0.26 Btu/hr•ft2•F
The reported Standardized Thermal Transmittance (Ust) was determined using CTS
Method, per Section 8.2(A) of NFRC 102.
Test Results Summary:
Standardized U-factor (Ust) - Base Window: ! ! ! 0.75 Btu/hr·ft2·F! CTS Method
Standardized U-factor (Ust) - Base with Attachment: !! 0.26 Btu/hr·ft2·F CTS Method
Percent Reduction Heat Transfer! ! ! ! ! ! ! 65.18 %
©2011 HeatSaver® Energy Systems, Inc. All rights reserved
Conclusions:
The U Factor of 0.26 listed above equals an R-Value of 3.85. Hence we extrapolate the
following.
! ! 1.87 Dbl. Glazed Window!! 0.86 Single Glazed Window
! ! 0.68!! Air film! ! ! ! 0.68
! ! 2.00!! Dead Air Space! ! 2.00
+ 3.85!! HeatSaver®! ! + 3.85
8.40 Total R-Values 7.39
! ! 0.11 U-Factors! ! 0.13
The additional values listed are established through ColoradoENERGY.org research
and accepted standards. The dead air space between the shades and the glass will
equal approximately 1 per inch, up to 2 inches after which a convection cycle would
negate further gains. Gains or losses due to air infiltration have not been factored in.
* The test method above does not include procedures to determine the heat flow due to either air
movement through the specimen or solar radiation effects. As a consequence, the thermal transmittance
results obtained do not reflect performances which may be expected from field installations due to not
accounting for solar radiation, air leakage effects, and the thermal bridge effects that may occur due to
the specific design and construction of the fenestration system opening. Therefore, it should be
recognized that the thermal transmittance results obtained from this test method are for ideal laboratory
conditions and should only be used for fenestration product comparisons and as input to thermal
performance analyses which also include solar, air leakage and thermal bridge effects.

http://www.heatsavershades.com/

©2011

A New Term: Deconstruction

Friday, January 9th, 2009

Since I have been talking about terms, I thought i would bring up the most popular new term that I have heard: deconstruction. There is a reason why this term has been bandied about of late. The housing problem is big in Cleveland. While it may not be any better or worse than in other cities around the country, we do have an older housing stock. Marry that with a high foreclosure rate, poor maintenance and high amount of scavenger crime, and you have a recipe for demolition. Furthermore, no one wants to live next to a boarded up home, so many Cleveland residents are clamoring for home destruction. Enter the world of deconstruction. Now, instead of bull dozing and landfilling a property, it can be taken apart and recycled.

We met with a representative of a great company and toured our building site. His name was Igor Rae and his company is Green Deconstruction Services. He was a wealth of information. What his company does is help you salvage what can be salvaged in a project. Our office buildings were built in 1885 and 1887. While the shell is brick masonry, there is still quite a bit of wood in the place. Buildings of that age typically used old growth lumber. That lumber is salvageable and reusable. Furthermore, it is typically of a higher quality than the lumber that we use in buildings today. They pull the nails and screws (which they recycle as well) and sell it to be reused. Deconstruction isn’t just about wood. Much of what is in a home can be reused or recycled. This project means extra tubs and sinks with fixtures. This company tries to find a home for these goods, by reuse, resale, donation or recycling. They salvage architectural details. This site has a lot of concrete. That means a sizable chunk of waste. We hope that it can all be reground and made onto new cement.

windowsGreen Deconstruction Services has recently acquired a new subsidiary. This other company is called Window Restorations. I had heard of this company before and was excited to speak with him about what they do. If you have old single pane windows with weights, then you know how drafty and wasteful they can be. Window Restorations comes in and removes them. But, instead of replacing them with new windows, they refurbish them. The weights are removed and recycled. then, the gap is filled and sealed. Next, they painstakingly replace or reinforce the glass to make it more thermally efficient. Then they reinstall them with a track and can even make them tilt able for easy cleaning. Rebuilding is often cheaper, and is always more environmentally friendly than replacement and throw away. Furthermore, the windows of our site are important architecturally to the front of the building. Their process can help us get historical tax credits, while still saving us money and making the building greener.

I am very excited about these guys. LEED credits are obtained by diverting materials from landfill, and this is a great start. I can’t wait to hear more about their evaluation.